911 Facts and Evidence Censored from CSPAN

During the 911 commission testimony Norman Meineta, the head of the Transportation Department spoke of how he was in the bunker with Cheney prior to the Pentagon strike. He stated on CSPAN before it was edited(after the first time) that he saw and heard a aid come in and say Mr. VP the plane is 50 miles out, 30 miles out and 10 miles out and asked do the orders still stand? Cheney replied, “Of course the *** **** orders still stand”. This was stated clearly on record but after it was said no one said anything and the media have not covered, more less anyone else. The reason this is so important, is because usually NORAD has the control to shoot down planes but in June of 2001 Cheney signed that Department of Defense Memo putting the shoot down orders in the hands of Rumsfeld, Bush and his if Bush was not there. Usually NORAD if a plane is hijacked of off course they will engage the plane then if they feel it is hijacked or a threat to North America will shoot it down. NOW WE EVEN HAVE THE NOARD TAPES BEING RELEASED AND PEOPLE ON THE TAPES SAYING THEY SPOTTED AND CAN SEE THE PLANES, WHAT ARE THE ORDERS, AND THEY ARE TOLD IT IS A DRILL AND NOT TO DO ANYTHING. This is also the other key piece of evidence because at first the government would not admit that there were drill taking place that day of planes hitting lower Manhattan and the pentagon. This is crazy, Why will no one discuss these facts in the Media??????????

CAN WE ALL SAY COVER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT DO THEY NOT WANT US TO KNOW?????????????????????????????????

SOME LINKS BELOW
June 1, 2001: New Policy: Only Defense Secretary May Approve Fighter Jet Launch
According to the New York Observer and government documents, the procedure for dealing with hijackings within the United States changes on this date. It requires that, with the exception of “immediate responses,” requests for military assistance must be forwarded to the defense secretary (Donald Rumsfeld) for approval. Rumsfeld later claims that protection against a domestic terrorist attack is not his responsibility; it is instead “a law-enforcement issue.” [New York Observer, 6/17/2004; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 7/31/1997 ; US Department of Defense, 6/1/2001 ]

REMEMBER THOSE “ABLE DANGER” ARMY DOC’S THAT THEY ARMY WAS TOLD TO DESTORY. HERE IS THE LINK:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=1131137