John Kerry: Building 7 Was Deliberately Demolished

p align="left">At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas,
Senator John Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building
7 by concluding that according to his information, the building
was brought down as a result of a controlled demolition, directly
contradicting the official line that the structure fell as
a result of fire and debris damage.

WTC Building 7 was a 47-story building in the
WTC complex that collapsed at 5:20pm on September 11. The
building had been structurally
reinforced and was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in
a uniform implosion within its own footprint in a matter of
seconds after sustaining relatively light debris and fire
damage following the collapse of the twin towers.

News networks like BBC and CNN were reporting
that the building had collapsed before it fell,
indicating that the media were being handed a script of events
that had yet to even unfold.

Ground
zero EMT's, firefighters and police were all told hours in
advance to clear a collapse zone for Building 7 as it
was going to be "brought down."

Questioned on WTC 7 by members of Austin 9/11
Truth Now at a Book People event in Austin Texas, Kerry responded,
"I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger
and I think they made the decision based on the danger that
it had in destroying other things, that they did it in a controlled
fashion."

Kerry is basically saying that the building
was intentionally demolished to prevent a random collapse
from damaging nearby buildings, but that premise has never
been explicitly admitted, with officials clinging to the notion
that the collapse was expected but was not aided by means
of explosive charges, because to admit to a controlled demolition
would be to expose foreknowledge of 9/11 itself.

Whether Kerry is basing his response on inside
knowledge or hearsay is largely irrelevant, the fact that
a sitting United States Senator is openly contradicting the
official 9/11 story as well as a multi-billion dollar insurance
lawsuit strikes at the root of the controversy surrounding
Building 7.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won
$861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild
on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment
in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone
resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the
contention that it was an accidental event caused by the fall
of the twin towers.

EMT's, firefighters and first responders all
knew the building was pulled, anyone with an ounce of common
sense can watch the videos and understand that building's
don't commit suicide - and yet Silverstein, the government,
and their propaganda arm Popular Mechanics, are wedded to
the myth that the structure fell as a result of fire damage.
They are beholden to this explanation because any revision
on their behalf would undermine the entire sequence of events
on 9/11 and call into question other aspects of the official
story.

Their credibility rests on sweeping the issue
of WTC 7 under the rug, which makes it our responsibility
to keep beating the Building 7 drum.

Official reports from both NIST and FEMA state
that they cannot explain why Building 7 fell, but maintain
that it was related to a terrorist attack on the complex on
9/11. However, the FEMA
report concludes that, "The specifics of the fires
in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain
unknown at this time. The best hypothesis has only a low probability
of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses
are needed to resolve this issue."

NIST is currently
undertaking a study of WTC 7 to determine if bombs or
incendiary devices were used to bring down the building.

Controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko
was shown footage and building schematics of Building 7 by
Dutch television and immediately
concluded that its collapse was a result of deliberately placed
explosives.

Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized
building takes weeks of preparation. A building as large as
WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, must have taken at least as
long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished
in response to fires spread from the twin towers is not a
satisfactory response, as the building could not have been
set up for unexpected demolition in only a few hours, much
less while fires burned inside. All personnel were withdrawn
from the area very early, meaning the explosives which can
clearly be seen in the videos were placed days or weeks before
9/11.

Kerry was also asked about the research of Dr.
Steven Jones, who has tested both samples of steel from the
twin towers as well as recovered dust, which have both tested
positive for the chemical signature of Thermate, which is
used to cut support beams in localized reactions during a
controlled demolition.

Kerry stated that he was not aware of the research and is
"open to hearing anything based in fact and evidence."

Since John Kerry is a fellow Skull and Bones member with
President Bush, allied to the fact that he took a dive despite
massive evidence of vote fraud during the 2004 election, we
won't hold our breath on the possibility of Kerry being a
torch bearer for a new investigation into 9/11, but his conclusion
that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished adds substantial weight
to a 9/11 enigma that officials are terrified will reach critical
mass.