US Hegemony Spawns Russian-Chinese Military Alliance
 
     
     By Paul Craig Roberts
     
     08/09/07 "ICH      " -- -- This       week the Russian and Chinese militaries are conducting a       joint military exercise involving large numbers of troops       and combat vehicles. The former Soviet Republics of       Tajikistan, Kyrgkyzstan, and Kazakstan are participating.       Other countries appear ready to join the military alliance.      
     
     This new potent military alliance is a real world response       to neoconservative delusions about US hegemony. Neocons       believe that the US is supreme in the world and can dictate       its course. The neoconservative idiots have actually written       papers, read by Russians and Chinese, about why the US must       use its military superiority to assert hegemony over Russia       and China.
     
     Cynics believe that the neocons are just shills, like Bush       and Cheney, for the military-security complex and are paid       to restart the cold war for the sake of the profits of the       armaments industry. But the fact is that the neocons       actually believe their delusions about American hegemony.      
     
     Russia and China have now witnessed enough of the Bush       administration’s unprovoked aggression in the world to take       neocon intentions seriously. As the US has proven that it       cannot occupy the Iraqi city of Baghdad despite 5 years of       efforts, it most certainly cannot occupy Russia or China.       That means the conflict toward which the neocons are driving       will be a nuclear conflict.
     
     In an attempt to gain the advantage in a nuclear conflict,       the neocons are positioning US anti-ballistic missiles on       Soviet borders in Poland and the Czech Republic. This is an       idiotic provocation as the Russians can eliminate       anti-ballistic missiles with cruise missiles. Neocons are       people who desire war, but know nothing about it. Thus, the       US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan.
     
     Reagan and Gorbachev ended the cold war. However, US       administrations after Reagan’s have broken the agreements       and understandings. The US gratuitously brought NATO and       anti-ballistic missiles to Russia’s borders. The Bush regime       has initiated a propaganda war against the Russian       government of V. Putin.
     
     These are gratuitous acts of aggression. Both the Russian       and Chinese governments are trying to devote resources to       their economic development, not to their militaries. Yet,       both are being forced by America’s aggressive posture to       revamp their militaries.
     
     Americans need to understand what the neocon Bush regime       cannot: a nuclear exchange between the US, Russia, and China       would establish the hegemony of the cockroach.
     
     In a mere 6.5 years the Bush regime has destroyed the       world’s good will toward the US. Today, America’s influence       in the world is limited to its payments of tens of millions       of dollars to bribed heads of foreign governments, such as       Egypt’s and Pakistan’s. The Bush regime even thinks that as       it has bought and paid for Musharraf, he will stand aside       and permit Bush to make air strikes inside Pakistan. Is Bush       blind to the danger that he will cause an Islamic revolution       within Pakistan that will depose the US puppet and present       the Middle East with an Islamic state armed with nuclear       weapons?
     
     Considering the instabilities and dangers that abound, the       aggressive posture of the Bush regime goes far beyond       recklessness. The Bush regime is the most irresponsibly       aggressive regime the world has seen since Hitler’s.
     
     If only a sweet young thing would volunteer to give Bush a       blowjob so that he can be impeached before he leads us to       Armageddon
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home